Gender can be defined as what you identify with. It is natural and congenital to accept the
gender you were assigned at birth. In
fact this was primarily my belief before beginning this assignment. There are some people who dispute this
however and are determined to blur the lines on what is being male or
female. This is more constructed from
one’s personal preference rather than believing in the societal designation is
what I have added from how others feel about gender. According to a book written by Dr. Judith
Lorber titled Paradoxes of Gender,
there are additional assignments for males who want to be recognized as women
and females who want to be recognized as men (1994). There are numerous labels for those terms,
some scientific and some offensive, but they do exist for those who fall
outside or in-between the perceived lines.
I find it very easy to be categorized as male under my definition and
the way I conduct myself. The
conventional thought on gender characteristics leads me to that critique of
myself. Though topics like raising
children and sports have become more blended today than ever before, we still use
gender to define what we see and who we are.
I do not think I do anything that will be seen as overly stereotypical of
being masculine and I rarely think of myself as feminine though a recent
exercise may disagree. After completing my answers for the “bem inventory”, I find myself directly on the line of
undifferentiated and feminine. It does
not discourage me or hurt my pride but the results of the study are what they
are. I will choose not to put as much
credence into the test as I place on myself for the moment.
To discuss gender in
context with leadership opens a new conversation. I first think of the setting of the
debate. We have been introduced to
articles and interviews where women are challenging to have the same rights and
opportunities as men when it comes to leadership. Dr. Ronald Riggio presents a genderless
offering to determine whether leaders are born or made (2009). He compares the concepts of whether it is
possible to have inborn characteristics with those that are taught from others
who want you to be in a leadership position.
This argument removes gender from the conversation overtly but subtly
implies that this topic can mean that those who do not have leadership roles are
neither born with certain capabilities or are being trained to do such. However Dr. Alice Eagly questions this from a
women’s perspective in a book she co-wrote with Dr. Linda Carli named Through the Labyrinth: The Truth About How
Women Become Leaders (2007). She
discussed that women are not being considered because of their stereotypes. This retort can imply that men are making
mistakes in their judgment as leaders on what is best for everyone
involved. I do not wish to be egocentric
but I disagree with both viewpoints to some degree. Referring back to the setting of the debate,
where are we questioning the leaders?
Are we being the spectators of prosperous ventures and saying that they
could do more for others or are we simply saying it could have been done a
different way? As it stands for the assimilation
of genders to occur, one must move from its position for the other to gain if
we were to believe it is not balanced.
To bring in gender means there is a request for men to acquiesce and
allow modifications for women. If this
were to happen, do women also make some concessions or create some leeway for
the betterment of men overall and is it required? So I think that is the crux of the argument
that goes on in our world today and way beyond my expertise. Therefore it is also something that I do not
have an answer to. That is one talk that
I choose to avoid and not have because I am in a situation where I see women
directly in front of me with control over what I can and cannot do going
forward now. My perspective is that
women have achieved some ground in the realm of leadership and to further that
point may mean that my generation of males gets buried as a result of it. See I find myself in the position of a
minority male who cannot catch the majority or hinder the progress of
women. I have no say either way as I am not
in competition for leading men and have seen women pass me by already. I just hope that there are equal
opportunities for all people absent of race, religion, sex or political
affiliation but that may be a dream that faded away some time ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you very much for viewing this entry and I hope you are able to return soon to continue to enjoy more of the site.
Please share your thoughts in the comment section.
Be blessed and enjoy life!